It has been assumed, by professionals and the public, that compassion is naturally an integral part of psychology and need not be mentioned.
This is not the case.
Compassion has been and continues to be studied for its clinical significance.
From this research and accumulated clinical experience, it is clear that compassion is far deeper, wider, and richer in nature than we could have imagined. It is emerging as an untapped resource for everyone, with or without mental health challenges.
Only a few of my clients are actively engaged in investigating compassion and applying it to their needs.
However, compassion first enters the office via the therapist and is often applied in plain language without having to mention the word.
Often, once the process of compassion takes hold, the formal practices can be applied.
Shame has also become a household word these days, thanks to Brené Brown.
I mention it here because the construct elements of shame (secrecy, character-based/global assessment, and avoidance), have their healing counterpart in elements of compassion (connection to others and common humanity, behaviour and incident-based assessment, and mindfulness (clarity and accountability).
In short, compassion is a direct counterpart to shame and can be employed as a means for reducing shame and shame-responding.
And, since shame is rampant in our culture, this can easily support the view that our culture is significantly compassion deficient.